Resumo Introdução A manobra de Epley é útil para o retorno da otocônia do braço longo do canal semicircular posterior para o utrículo. Diferentes manobras são necessárias para mover a otocônia para fora do braço curto do canal semicircular posterior e para dentro do utrículo. Objetivo Diagnosticar a VPPB do tipo braço curto do canal semicircular posterior e tratá-la com a manobra de incline and balance. Método Foram diagnosticados 171 casos como VPPB de canal semicircular posterior com base na manobra de Dix-Hallpike positiva. Primeiro tentamos tratar os pacientes com a manobra de incline and balance e, em seguida, executamos a manobra de Dix-Hallpike novamente. Se a repetição da manobra de Dix-Hallpike desse resultados negativos, diagnosticávamos o paciente como VPPB do canal semicircular posterior do tipo braço curto e considerávamos que ele ou ela havia sido curado pela manobra de incline and balance; caso contrário, provavelmente o paciente apresentava VPPB do canal semicircular posterior do tipo braço longo e tratávamos o paciente com a manobra de Epley. Resultados Aproximadamente 40% dos casos foram curados pela manobra de incline and balance, com resultados negativos nas manobras de Dix-Hallpike repetidas, e foram diagnosticados com litíase de braço curto. Conclusão A VPPB de canal semicircular posterior do tipo braço curto pode ser diagnosticada e tratada de maneira conveniente e confortável.

Abstract Introduction The Epley maneuver is useful for the otoconia to return from the long arm of the posterior semicircular canal into the utricle. To move otoconia out of the posterior semicircular canal short arm and into the utricle, we need different maneuvers. Objective To diagnose the short-arm type BPPV of the posterior semicircular canal and treat them with bow-and-yaw maneuver. Methods 171 cases were diagnosed as BPPV of the posterior semicircular canal based on a positive Dix-Hallpike maneuver. We first attempted to treat patients with the bow-and-yaw maneuver and then performed the Dix-Hallpike maneuver again. If the repeated Dix-Hallpike maneuver gave negative results, we diagnosed the patient with the short-arm type of BPPV of the posterior semicircular canal and considered the patient to have been cured by the bow-and-yaw maneuver; otherwise, probably the long-arm type BPPV of the posterior semicircular canal existed and we treated the patient with the Epley maneuver. Results Approximately 40% of the cases were cured by the bow-and-yaw maneuver, giving negative results on repeated Dix-Hallpike maneuvers, and were diagnosed with short-arm lithiasis. Conclusion The short-arm type posterior semicircular canal BPPV can be diagnosed and treated in a convenient and comfortable manner.

Abstract The formation behavior of a single bubble in power-law fluids (carboxymethyl cellulose solution, CMC) and Newtonian fluids (glycerol solution) was experimentally investigated via a high-speed camera. The effects of liquid property, orifice diameter and gas flow rate on bubble volume and aspect ratio were observed. It was found that the formation time and detaching volume increased with the increase of fluid viscosity. The increase of bubble aspect ratio during the bubble formation process was complex, with main emphasis on the decrease in the initial stage and an increase in the final stage along with the shear thinning property variation. Nevertheless, the bubble detaching volume, instantaneous volume and formation time increased following the increase of orifice diameter and gas flow rate. On the contrary, the bubble aspect ratio decreased with the orifice diameter increase but increased with a higher gas flow rate.